Risicotaxatie: waarheen, waarvoor?

Literatuur

• Bonta, J., Harman, W.G., Hann, R.G. & Cormier, R.B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 61-79.
• Bonta, J., Blais, J. & Wilson, H.A. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggression and violent behavior, 19(3), 278-287.
• Campbell, M.A., French, S. & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567-590.
• De Vogel, V., De Ruiter, C., van Beek, D. & Mead, G. (2004). Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law and human behavior, 28(3), 235- 251.
• De Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Koster, K. & Bogaerts, S. (2015). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse, 27(1), 51-70.
• Evans, S.A. & Salekin, K.L. (2016). Violence risk communication: What do judges and forensic clinicians prefer and understand? Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 3(3–4), 143–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tam0000062
• Guay, J.P. & Parent, G. (2018). Broken Legs, Clinical Overrides, and Recidivism Risk: An Analysis of Decisions to Adjust Risk Levels With the LS/CMI. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(1), 82-100.
• Hanson, R.K. (2018). Long-term recidivism studies show that desistance is the norm. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45, 1340- 1346.
• Hanson, R.K., Babchishin, K.M., Helmus, L.M., Thornton, D. & Phenix, A. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static- 99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological assessment, 29(5), 582.
• Hanson, R.K., Bourgon, G., McGrath, R.K., Kroner, D., D’Amora, D.A., Thomas, S.S & Tavarez, L.P. (2017b). A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results in corrections through the development of a common language. New York, NY: The Council of State Governments Justice Center.
• Hanson, R.K. & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348.
• Hanson, R.K., Harris, A J., Letourneau, E., Helmus, L.M. & Thornton, D. (2018). Reductions in risk based on time offense-free in the community: Once a sexual offender, not always a sexual offender. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(1), 48.
• Hanson, R.K., Harris, A.J.R, Scott, T.L. & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections research user report 2007-05). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/res/cor/rep/_fl/crp2007-05-en.pdf
• Hanson, R.K. & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex  offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136. doi:10.1023/A:1005482921333
• Heilbrun, K., Philipson, J., Berman, L. & Warren, J. (1999). Risk communication: Clinicians’ reported approaches and perceived values. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(3), 397–406.
• Helmus, L.M. (2018). Sex  offender risk assessment: where are we and where are we going?. Current psychiatry reports, 20(6), 46.
• Hilton, N.Z., Harris, G.T. & Rice, M.E. (2006). Sixty-Six Years of Research on the Clinical Versus Actuarial Prediction of Violence. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005285877
• Hogan, N.R. & Olver, M.E. (2019). Static and Dynamic Assessment of Violence Risk Among Discharged Forensic Patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 0093854819846526.
• Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J. & Holsinger, A.M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676  offenders and 97 correctional programs?. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77-93.
• Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Monahan, J. (2007). Clinical and actuarial predictions of violence. In D. Faigman, D. Kaye, M. Saks, J. Sanders & E. Cheng (Eds.), Modern scientifi c evidence: The law and science of expert testimony (pp. 122–147). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel en Seksueel Geweld tegen Kinderen. Gewogen risico. Deel 2: Behandeling opleggen aan zedendelinquenten. Den Haag: Nationaal Rapporteur 2017.
• Olver, M.E., Wong, S.C., Nicholaichuk, T. & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual  offender version: Assessing sex  offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological assessment, 19(3), 318.
• Peters, E., Hibbard, J., Slovic, D. & Dieckmann, N. (2007). Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Affairs, 26(3), 741-748. doi: 10.1377/hltha.26.3.741
• Pinker, S. (2011). The Better Angels of our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and its Causes. New York: Vicking. Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling (2006). Ontsnappen aan medialogica: Tbs in de maatschappelijke beeldvorming. Amsterdam: SWP Uitgeverij B.V. Scurich, N. (2018). The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36(5), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2382
• Sewall, L.A. & Olver, M.E. (2019). Psychopathy and treatment outcome: Results from a sexual violence reduction program. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000297
• Singh, J.P., Desmarais, S.L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C. et al. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–2060 https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
• Smid, W.J. (2020). Risicotaxatie. In W. Smid (Ed.) Zicht op Zedendelinquenten: Achtergronden, Risicotaxatie en Behandeling. Amsterdam, NL: Boom.
• Smid, W.J., Kamphuis, J.H., Wever, E.C. & Van Beek, D. (2013). Treatment referral for sex  offenders based on clinical judgment versus actuarial risk assessment: match and analysis of mismatch. Journal of interpersonal violence, 28(11), 2273-2289.
• Strub, D.S., Douglas, K.S. & Nicholls, T.L. (2014). The validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme amongst  offenders and civil psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148-159.
• Van den Berg, J.W., Smid, W., Schepers, K., Wever, E., van Beek, D., Janssen, E. & Gijs, L. (2018). The predictive properties of dynamic sex  offender risk assessment instruments: A meta- analysis. Psychological assessment, 30(2), 179.
• Wakeling, H.C., Mann, R.E. & Carter, A.J. (2012). Do Low-risk Sexual  offenders Need Treatment? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 51(3), 286-299.