De rem op samenwerking

Over de rol van angst en hebzucht
06/01/2017
Carsten de Dreu
Geen reacties
De Psycholoog 2017-1 Cover
Issue 1
1206 Weergaven
5 Downloads
  • Introductie
  • Mierenkolonie
  • De remmende werking van angst en hebzucht
  • Is angst dé rem op samenwerking
  • Angst als brandstof voor samenwerking?
  • Samenvatting en conclusies
  • Noten
  • Literatuurlijst
  • Over de auteur
Log in
Welke neurobiologische processen en sociaal psychologische mechanismen een rol spelen bij hebzucht en angst is niet bekend, stelt Carsten de Dreu. Antwoorden op deze vragen zijn echter wel belangrijk. ‘Want pas als we die hebben, kunnen we proberen de rem op samen werking te ontspannen,’ aldus De Dreu. ‘Pas dan kunnen we gericht en effectief werken aan een participatie samenleving. Pas dan weten we hoe we potentieel gewelddadige conflicten kunnen reguleren en samenwerking kunnen stimuleren.’

Introductie

Al ruim honderdvijftig miljoen jaar wordt de aarde bevolkt door mieren. Da’s best lang. Wij, de homo sapiens, zijn er nog maar zo’n tweehonderdduizend jaar. Bovendien zijn mieren niet alleen behoorlijk lang aanwezig, ze zijn ook nog eens tamelijk succesvol. Niet alle mieren zijn hetzelfde, maar de soort komt werkelijk overal voor. De mier heeft zich telkens subliem weten aan te passen aan haar omgeving en benut haar omgeving op een uiterst slimme manier. Mieren maken grote bouw werken die vaak generaties lang mee gaan. Mieren doen aan landbouw en ze beschermen hun leefgebied tegen indringers van buiten [1, 2]. Tijdens al die activiteiten werken mieren goed samen. Het is door die onderlinge samenwerking dat mieren het al zo lang zo goed voor elkaar hebben [3, 4].

Ondanks dat de menselijke soort er nog maar pas is, is ook die best goed bezig. Wereldoorlogen, natuurrampen en pandemieën ten spijt, heeft de menselijke soort door

wetenschapsagenda.nl

Literatuurlijst

  1. Schultz TR, SosaCalvo J, Brady SG, Lopes CT … & Vaconcelos HL (2015). The most relictual fungusfarming ant species cultivates the most recently evolved and highly domesticated fungal symbiont species. Am Nat, 185, 693703.
  2. Whitehouse MEA & Jaffe K (1996). Ant wars: Combat strategies, territory and nest defence in the leaf cutting ant Atta Laevigata. Anim Behav, 51, 12071217.
  3. Wilson EO (2012). The social conquest of earth. Princeton U Press.
  4. Wilson EO & Holldobler B (2005). Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proc Nat Acad Sciences, 102, 1336713371.
  5. Lewis SL & Malin MA (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519, 171180.
  6. Tomasello M & Vaish A (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Ann Rev Psych, 64, 231255.
  7. Crespi B (2014). Insectan Apes. Hum Nat, 25, 629.
  8. Foster KR & Ratnieks FLW (2005). A new eusocial vertebrate? Tr Ecol Evol, 20, 363364.
  9. Kesebir S (2012). The superorganism account of human sociality: How and when human groups are like beehives. Pers Soc Psych Rev, 16, 233261.
  10. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE & Wilson EO (2012). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466, 10571062.
  11. Whiten A, Horner V & De Waal FBM (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437, 737740.
  12. De Dreu CKW (2010). Social conflict: the emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In ST Fiske et al (Eds.). Hndb Soc Psych (Vol. 2, pp. 983 1023). Wiley.
  13. De Dreu CKW (2013). Human cooperation: challenges for science and practice. Psych Science Public Interest, 14, 117118.
  14. Mill JS (1871/1998). Principles of political economy. Oxford U Press.
  15. Pennisi E (2005). How did cooperative behavior evolve. Science, 309, 93.
  16. West SA, El Mouden C & Gardner A (2011). Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol Hum Behav, 32, 231262.
  17. Roseth CJ, Johnson DW & Johnson RT (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psych Bull, 134, 223246.
  18. Barlow J & KoberleGaiser M (2009). Delivering innovation in hospital construction: Contracts and collaboration in the UK’s private fi nance initiative hospitals program. Cal Mngm Rev, 51, 126143.
  19. De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR & Kwon S (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A metaanalytical review and test of two theories. J Pers Soc Psych, 78, 889–905.
  20. Gelfand MJ, Leslie LM, Keller K & De Dreu CKW (2012). Confl ict cultures in organizations: How leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizationallevel consequences. J App Psych, 97, 11311147.
  21. Nijstad BA, BergerSelman F & De Dreu CKW (2014). Innovation in top management teams: Minority dissent, transformational leadership, and radical innovations. Eur J Work Org Psych, 23, 310322.
  22. De Dreu CKW & West MA (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J Appl Psych, 86, 11911201.
  23. Bowles S & Gintis H (2011). A cooperative species. Princeton U Press.
  24. Darwin Ch (1859/1985). The origins of species by means of natural selection. John Murray/ Penguin Books
  25. De Dreu CKW, Balliet D & Halevy N (2014). Parochial cooperation in humans: Forms and functions of selfsacrifice in intergroup competition and conflict. Adv Motiv Science, 1, 147.
  26. Wilson DS & Wilson EO (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Qu J Biol, 82, 327348.
  27. Jones TH, Clark DA, Edwards AA, Davidson DW et al. (2004).´The chemistry of exploding ants,´Camponotus spp. (cylindricus complex).´J Chem Ecol, 8, 14791492.
  28. Von Rueden CR & Jaeggi AV (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proc Nat Acad Sciences (in press).
  29. Dahrendorf R (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford U Press.
  30. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH & Anderson C (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych Rev, 110, 265284.
  31. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AJR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M & Kunst, AE (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. New Eng J Med, 358, 24682481.
  32. Bradley RH & Corwyn RF (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Ann Rev Psych, 53, 371399.
  33. Dawes RM (1980). Social dilemmas. Ann Rev Psych, 31, 169193.
  34. Komorita SS & Parks CD (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixedmotive interaction. Ann Rev Psych, 46, 183207.
  35. Schelling TC (2006). Strategies of commitment and other essays. Harvard U Press.
  36. Hardin G (1968). The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science, 162, 12431248.
  37. Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Pol Science Rev, 92, 122.
  38. Keser C & Van Winden F (2000). Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand J Econ, 102, 2329.
  39. Coombs CH (1973). A parameterization of the prisoner’s dilemma game. Behav Science, 18, 424428.
  40. Pruitt DG & Kimmel MJ (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Ann Rev Psych, 28, 363392.
  41. Rapoport A, & Chammah AM (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma. U Michigan Press.
  42. Ahn TK, Ostrom E, Schmidt D, Shupp R & Walker J (2001). Cooperation in PD games. Fear, Greed, and History of Play. Public Choice, 106, 137–155.
  43. Bruins JJ, Liebrand WBG & Wilke HAM (1989). About the saliency of fear and greed in social dilemmas. Eur J Soc Psych, 19, 155161.
  44. Engel C & Zhurakhovska L (2016). When is the risk of cooperation worth taking? The prisoner’s dilemma as a game of multiple motives. Appl Econ Letters (in press).
  45. Kuwabara K (2005). Nothing to fear but fear itself: Fear of fear, fear of greed and gender effects in two person asymmetric social dilemmas. Soc Forces, 84, 12571272.
  46. Simpson B (2003). Sex, fear, and greed: A social dilemma analysis of gender and cooperation. Soc Forces, 82, 3552.
  47. Steinel W & De Dreu CKW (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. J Pers Soc Psych, 86, 419 – 434.
  48. Van Lange PAM, Liebrand WBG & Kuhlman DM (1990). Causal attribution of choice behavior in three N-person Prisoner’s Dilemmas. J Exp Soc Psych, 26, 3448.
  49. De Dreu CKW, Scholte HS, Van Winden FAAM & Ridderinkhof KR (2015). Oxytocin tempers calculated greed but not impulsive defense in predatorprey contests. Soc Cogn Aff Neuroscience, 5, 721728.
  50. De Dreu CKW, Kret ME & Sligte IG (2016). Modulating prefrontal control in humans reveals distinct pathways to competitive success and collective waste. Soc Cogn A Neuroscience 11, 12361244.
  51. Giacomantonio M, Vecchio G & De Dreu CKW (2016). Unpublished Data. Leiden U.
  52. Giff n MR, Prozachkova E, Ten Velden FS, Lucassen P & De Dreu CKW (2016). Unpublished Data. Leiden U
  53. Kahneman D & Tversky A (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263291.
  54. Loewenstein GF, Thompson LL & Bazerman MH (1989). Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J Pers Soc Psych, 57, 426441.
  55. Fehr E & Schmidt KM (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Qu J Econ, 114, 817–868.
  56. Beauchamp G (2014). Social predation: How group living benefits predators and prey. Academic Press.
  57. Hamilton WD (1970). Geometry for the selfi sh herd. J Theor Biol, 31, 295311.
  58. Packer C & Ruttan L (1988). The evolution of cooperative hunting. Am Nat, 132, 159198.
  59. Balliet D, Wu Y & De Dreu, CKW (2014). Ingroup favoritism and cooperation: A metaanalysis. Psych Bull, 140, 15561581.
  60. Cosgrave J, Hargrave K, Foresti M, Massa I (2016). Europe’s refugees and migrants: Hidden flows, tightening borders and spiraling costs. ODI Report from https://www.odi.org/publications.
  61. De Dreu CKW, Gross JAJ, Meder Z, Griff n MR, Prochazkova E, Krikeb J & Columbus S (2016). Ingroup defense, outgroup aggression, and coordination failure in intergroup conflict. Proc Nat Acad Sciences (in press).
  62. De Dreu CKW, Greer LL, Handgraaf MJJ, Shalvi S, Van Kleef GA, Baas M, Ten Velden FS, Van Dijk E & Feith SWW (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328, 14081411.
  63. De Dreu CKW, Greer LL, Van Kleef GA, Shalvi S & Handgraaf MJJ (2011). Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proc Nat Acad Sciences, 108, 12621266.
  64. De Dreu CKW & Kret ME (2016). Oxytocin conditions intergroup relations through upregulated ingroup empathy, cooperation, conformity, and defense. Biol Psychiatry, 79, 165173.
  65. Shalvi S & De Dreu CKW (2014). Oxytocin promotes group serving dishonesty. Proc Nat Acad Sciences, 111, 55035507.
  66. Carter CS (2014). Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior. Ann Rev Psych, 65, 1739.
  67. De Dreu CKW & Balliet D (2016). Intergroup competition may not be needed for shaping group cooperation and cultural group selection. Brain Behav Sciences, 39, e36.
  68. Jervis R (1976). Perception and misperception in international relations. Princeton U Press.
  69. Purzycki BG, Apicella C, Atkinson QD, Cohen E, McNamara RA et al. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, 327+
  70. Cacioppo JT & Decety J (2011). Social neuroscience: Challenges and opportunities in the study of complex behavior. Ann NY Acad Sciences, 1224, 162 – 173.
  71. Camerer CF (2013). Goals, methods, and progress in neuroeconomics. Ann Rev Econ, 5, 425455.