Geweld in tijden van corona

Hoe de Covid-19 pandemie het stereotype denken over huiselijk geweld nog duidelijker blootlegt
02/10/2020
Vivienne de Vogel, Kasia Uzieblo
Geen reacties
Domestic_Violence_Man_shutterstock_1123885724
Volume 55, Issue 10

How the COVID-19 pandemic reveals our stereotypical thinking about domestic violence even more

V. de Vogel & K. Uzieblo

The prevalence of domestic violence seems to be increasing during
the COVID-19 pandemic. In most media coverage and calls for
preventive initiatives from professionals and policy, males are
consistently portrayed as perpetrators of domestic violence and
females and children as victims, also by leading organizations
like the WHO. However, research has clearly shown that there
are more types of domestic violence, like sibling and elder abuse
and that women are also capable of serious violence towards their
family. The current article aims to summarize the literature on
gender and domestic violence, and to discuss the societal reluctance
to acknowledge females as potential perpetrators, and males as
potential victims.

220 Weergaven
8 Downloads
  • Prevalentie huiselijk geweld door vrouwen
    • Waarom komen vrouwen minder in beeld als dader dan mannen?
    • Waarom komen mannen minder in beeld als slachtoffer?
  • Weerstand om vrouwen als pleger van huiselijk geweld te zien
  • Belang van erkennen dat vrouwen gewelddadig kunnen zijn
  • Tot slot
  • Literatuurlijst
  • Over de auteur
Log in
Huiselijk geweld lijkt sterk toe te nemen tijdens de Covid-19 pandemie. Wat opvalt in de berichtgeving, is dat er stelselmatig wordt uitgegaan van mannelijke daders en vrouwelijke slachtoffers. Is dit wel terecht? In dit artikel beschrijven Vivienne de Vogel en Kasia Uzieblo dat ook vrouwen huiselijk geweld plegen en gaan ze in op de weerstand in de maatschappij om vrouwen als pleger én om mannen als slachtoffer te zien van huiselijk geweld.

Huiselijk geweld is de meest voorkomende vorm van geweld met een enorme impact op alle betrokkenen, die gepaard gaat met hoge maatschappelijke kosten. Daarmee vormt het wereldwijd één van de grootste volksgezondheidsproblemen (Geweld hoort nergens thuis, 2018). Niet alleen lijden de directe slachtoffers onder dit geweld, ook getuigen van huiselijk geweld dragen hun ervaringen levenslang met zich mee. Zo is het meemaken van geweld tussen ouders of opvoeders voor kinderen een belangrijke risicofactor voor het ontwikkelen van psychische en gedragsproblemen, en om later zelf pleger en/of slachtoffer te worden van huiselijk geweld (bijv. Ehrensaft et al., 2003). De term huiselijk geweld is breed; hieronder vallen alle vormen van fysiek, psychisch, seksueel en economisch geweld die in huiselijke kring plaatsvinden, zoals partnergeweld, kindermishandeling en ouderenmishandeling.

De aandacht voor huiselijk geweld neemt sterk toe in deze crisistijd. Huiselijk geweld was al voor de COVID-19 pandemie een groot volksgezondheidsprobleem. Maar sinds de crisis, waarbij mensen noodgedwongen veel thuis verblijven, is het probleem nog urgenter

Literatuurlijst

  1. Allen, C.T., Swan, S.C. & Raghavan, C. (2009). Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1816-1834.
  2. Bates, E.A., Kaye, L.K., Pennington, C.R. & Hamlin, I. (2019). What about the male victims? Exploring the impact of gender stereotyping on implicit attitudes and behavioural intentions associated with intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 81, 1-15.
  3. Cinquegrana, V., Baldry, A.C. & Pagliaro, S. (2018). Intimate partner violence and bystanders’ helping behaviour: An experimental study. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10, 24-35.
  4. Cortoni, F., Babchishin, K.M. & Rat, C. (2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145-162.
  5. Denov, M.S. (2004). The long-term effects of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators: A qualitative study of male and female victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1137-1156.
  6. Desmarais, S.L., Reeves, K.A., Nicholls, T.L., Telford, R.P. & Fiebert, M.S. (2012a). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships: Part 1. Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3, 140-169.
  7. Desmarais, S.L., Reeves, K.A., Nicholls, T.L., Telford, R.P. & Fiebert, M.S. (2012b). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3, 170-198.
  8. Ehrensaft, M.K., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E., Chen, H. & Johnson, J.G. (2003). Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: A 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 741–753
  9. Finkelhor, D., Turner, H.A., Shattuck, A. & Hamby, S.L. (2015). Prevalence of childhood exposure to violence, crime, and abuse: Results from the national survey of children’s exposure to violence. JAMA pediatrics, 169(8), 746-754.
  10. Flatley, J. (2016). Abuse during childhood: Findings from the crime survey for England and Wales, year ending March 2016. Office for National Statistics. https://www.welshwomensaid.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Abuse-During-Childhood-Findings-from-the-Crime-Survey-2016.pdf
  11. Flynn, S., Abel, K., While, D., Mehta, H. & Shaw, J. (2011). Mental illness, gender and homicide: A population-based descriptive study. Psychiatry Research, 185, 368-75.
  12. Habiballah, N. (2020). Wereldwijde toename huiselijk geweld door coronavirus. NOS. Beschikbaar: https://nos.nl/collectie/13841/artikel/2329645-wereldwijde-toename-huiselijk-geweld-doorcoronavirus.
  13. Hamel, J., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T.L., Malley-Morrison, K. & Aaronson, J. (2009). Domestic violence and child custody: are family court professionals’ decisions based on erroneous beliefs? Journal of Aggression, Confl ict and Peace Research, 1(2), 37.
  14. Hines, D.A. & Douglas, E.M. (2015). Health problems of partner violence victims: comparing help-seeking men to a population-based sample. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 48(2), 136-144.
  15. Jackson, S.L. (2016). All elder abuse perpetrators are not alike: The heterogeneity of elder abuse perpetrators and implications for intervention. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(3), 265-285.
  16. Knaap, L.M. van der & Bogaerts, S. (2010). Mannen en vrouwen als plegers van huiselijk geweld. Justitiële Verkenningen, 36(8), 46-61.
  17. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., McCullars, A. & Misra, T. A. (2012a). Motivations for men and women’s intimate partner violence perpetration: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 429-468.
  18. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Misra, T., Selwyn, C. & Rohling, M.L. (2012b). Rates of bidirectional versus unidirectional intimate partner violence across samples, sexual orientations, and race/ethnicities: A comprehensive review. Partner Abuse, 3, 199-230.
  19. Laskey, P., Bates, E.A. & Taylor, J.C. (2019). A systematic literature review of intimate partner violence victimisation: An inclusive review across gender and sexuality. Aggression and violent behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.014
  20. Lysova, A., Dim, E.E. & Dutton, D. (2019). Prevalence and consequences of intimate partner violence in Canada as measured by the National Victimization Survey. Partner abuse, 10(2), 199-221.
  21. Machado, A., Hines, D. & Matos, M. (2016). Help-seeking and needs of male victims of intimate partner violence in Portugal. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 17(3), 255–264.
  22. Ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, Verenging van Nederlandse Gemeenten (2018). Geweld hoort nergens thuis. Aanpak huiselijk geweld en kindermishandeling. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/beleidsnotas/2018/04/25/geweld-hoort-nergens-thuis-aanpak-huiselijk-gewelden-kindermishandeling
  23. Morgan, W. & Wells, M. (2016). ‘It’s deemed unmanly’: Men’s experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV). Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 27(3), 404–418.
  24. Moretti, M.M., Bartolo, T., Craig, S., Slaney, K. & Odgers, C. (2014). Gender and the transmission of risk: A prospective study of adolescent girls exposed to maternal versus paternal interparental violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 80-92.
  25. Morrill, M. & Bachman, C. (2013). Confronting the gender myth: An exploration of variance in male versus female experience with sibling abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(8), 1693–1708.
  26. Olsson, M. & Martiny, S.E. (2018). Does exposure to counterstereotypical role models infl uence girls’ and women’s gender stereotypes and career choices? A review of social psychological research. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2264, 1-15.
  27. Rodriques, L.M., Armenti, N.A. & Babcock, J.C. (2019). Beyond traditional treatment approaches for intimate partner violence. Integrating a dyadic perspective. In J.L. Ireland, C.A. Ireland & Birch, P. (Eds). Violent and Sexual Offenders: Assessment, Treatment and Management (2nd Edition) (pp. 370-382). London: Routledge.
  28. Spencer, C., Mallory, A.B., Cafferky, B.M., Kimmes, J.G., Beck, A.R. & Stith, S. M. (2019). Mental health factors and intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence, 9(1), 1–17.
  29. Stanziani, M., Newman, A.K., Cox, J. & Coffey, C.A. (2019). Role call: Sex, gender roles, and intimate partner violence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 26, 208–225.
  30. Stith, S.M., Smith, D.B., Penn, C.E., Ward, D.B. & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior,10, 65-98
  31. Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C. & Moreno, C.G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 382(9895), 859-865.
  32. Straus, M.A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332-362.
  33. Straus, M.A. (2012). Blaming the messenger for the bad news about partner violence by women: The methodological, theoretical, and value basis of the purported invalidity of the Confl ict Tactics Scales. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 538-556.
  34. Straus, M.A. & Michel-Smith, Y. (2014). Mutuality, severity, and chronicity of violence by father-only, mother-only, and mutually violent parents as reported by university students in 15 nations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(4), 664-676.
  35. Trimbos (2020). Nieuwe coronavirus, alcohol, roken, drugs en mentale gezondheid. https://www.trimbos.nl/kennis/corona/?bericht=2982 Tsui, V. (2014). Male victims of intimate partner abuse: Use and helpfulness of services. Social work, 59(2), 121-130.
  36. Tucker, C.J., Finkelhor, D., Shattuck, A.M. & Turner, H. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of sibling victimization types. Child abuse & neglect, 37(4), 213-223.
  37. Vogel, V. de (2017). Geweld door vrouwen. Motieven en verklaringen. Amsterdam: Boom Psychologie & Psychiatrie.
  38. Vogel, V. de & Spa, E. de (2015). Criminele voorgeschiedenis en delictanalyse bij vrouwelijke terbeschikkinggestelden: Een vergelijking met mannen. Panopticon, 36, 433-448.
  39. Vogel, V. de, Stam, J., Bouman, Y., Horst, P. ter & Lancel, M. (2016). Violent women: A multicentre study into gender differences in forensic psychiatric patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 27, 145-168.
  40. World Health Organization (2020). Intimate partner and sexual violence (violence against women). www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/ violence/sexual/en/.
  41. Yon, Y., Mikton, C.R., Gassoumis, Z.D. & Wilber, K. H. (2017). Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Global health, 5(2), e147–e156.