Hoe ervaren cliënten in de ambulante forensische GGZ telepsychiatrie?

Verschillen tussen positief en negatief gestemden
02/12/2022
Julia Wilpert
Geen reacties
shutterstock_1170951868-oatawa
Volume 57, Issue 12

Samenvatting

How do clients in outpatient forensic mental health care experience telepsychiatry? Differences between positive and negative opinions

J. Wilpert

The pandemic lockdown in March 2020 caused a large-scale change in delivery of treatment because mental health care had to continue remotely. Forensic outpatients (n = 399) were asked about their experience with this sudden switch to telepsychiatry. Almost half of them (44,4%) rated the remote treatment positive, 18,8% of them negative and the remaining 36,8% were mixed/undecided. Comparing the negative and positive groups yielded differences on a number of characteristics. Respondents negative about remote therapy were more likely to experience depression, adhd, personality disorders, co-morbidity, less privacy at home, more stress, below average conscientiousness and neurotiscism and dissatisfaction with working alliance aspects. It is, therefore, recommended to monitor different elements to help identify pitfalls in telepsychiatry. This is best done by deliberating with patients about what works for them and what doesn’t.

973 Weergaven
5 Downloads
  • Samenvatting
  • Inleiding
  • Methode
    • Procedure en onderzoeksgroep
    • Instrument
  • Resultaten
    • Verschillen tussen positief en negatief
    • Voorkeur toekomstige behandelwijze
  • Discussie
    • Conclusie
  • Literatuurlijst
  • Over de auteur
Log in
Vanwege de coronapandemielockdown in maart 2020 moest de ggz grootschalig op afstand plaatsvinden. Cliënten in de ambulante forensische ggz (n = 399) werd gevraagd naar hun ervaring met deze plotselinge overstap naar telepsychiatrie. Respondenten die negatief waren over sessies op afstand bleken te verschillen van degenen die positief waren, onder meer wat betreft diagnosen, persoonlijkheids-trekken, privacy, stress en beleving van de werkrelatie. Dit onderschrijft het belang van rekening houden met cliëntperceptie bij deze behandelvorm.

Inleiding

Door de eerste lockdown, vanwege de coronaviruspandemie in maart 2020, kwam de hulpverlening op afstand in een stroomversnelling. Het was geen nieuw fenomeen in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg (ggz). Ruim twintig jaar geleden werden al voordelen als kosten- en tijdbesparing en groter bereik als gunstig beschouwd, van wat toen telepsychiatrie (therapiesessies via communicatiemiddelen als telefoon en computer in plaats van op locatie) werd genoemd. Maar waar toen nog een groot gebrek aan empirisch onderzoek werd geconstateerd (Baer, Elford & Cukor, 1997; Frueh et al., 2000), zijn we inmiddels wat wijzer, hoewel onderzoeksresultaten wisselend zijn (Montes, 2018).

De algemene tendens is dat ggz op afstand soortgelijke uitkomsten bewerkstelligt als op locatie

De algemene tendens is dat ggz op

Literatuurlijst

  1. Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Carlbring, P., Riper, H. & Hedman, E. (2014). Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry, 13(3), 288–295.
  2. Antonacci, D.J., Bloch, R.M., Saeed, S.A., Yildirim, Y. & Talley, J. (2008). Empirical evidence on the use and effectiveness of telepsychiatry via videoconferencing: implications for forensic and correctional psychiatry. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(3), 253–269.
  3. Askjer, S. & Mathiasen, K. (2021). The working alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive therapy for depression: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 25, 100404.
  4. Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M.L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D., Rice-Thorp, N.M., Lohr, J. & Thorp, S.R. (2012). Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review. Psychological Services, 9(2), 111–131.
  5. Baer, L., Elford, D.R. & Cukor, P. (1997). Telepsychiatry at forty: what have we learned? Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 5(1), 7–17.
  6. Banbury, A., Nancarrow, S., Dart, J., Gray, L. & Parkinson, L. (2018). Telehealth interventions delivering home-based support group videoconferencing: systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e25.
  7. Batastini, A.B., King, C.M., Morgan, R.D. & McDaniel, B. (2016). Telepsychological services with criminal justice and substance abuse clients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Services, 13(1), 20–30.
  8. Carbajosa, P., Boira, S. & Tomás-Aragonés, L. (2013). Difficulties, skills and therapy strategies in interventions with court-ordered batterers in Spain. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 118–124.
  9. Chherawala, N. & Gill, S. (2020). Up-to-date review of psychotherapy via videoconference: Implications and recommendations for the RANZCP Psychotherapy Written Case during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australasian Psychiatry, 28(5), 517–520.
  10. Daffern, M., Shea, D.E., & Ogloff, J.R.P. (2021). Remote Forensic Evaluations and Treatment in the Time of COVID-19: An International Survey of Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 27(3), 354–369.
  11. De Beurs, E., Blankers, M., Goudriaan, A., De Koning, M. & Dekker, J. (2021). Beeldbellen in de ggz: de mening van cliënten. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 3.
  12. Flückiger, C., Del Re, A.C., Wampold, B.E. & Horvath, A.O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340.
  13. Frueh, B C., Deitsch, S.E., Santos, A.B., Gold, P.B., Johnson, M.R., Meisler, N., Magruder, K.M. & Ballenger, J.C. (2000). Procedural and methodological issues in telepsychiatry research and program development. Psychiatric Services, 51(12), 1522–1527.
  14. Hennemann de Oliveira Becker, N. & Pereira da Cruz Benetti, S. (2014). Factors associated with the formation of the therapeutic alliance in mandatory psychotherapy. Estudos de Psicologia, 19(4), 296-304.
  15. Henskens, R., Sturm, A., Robbers, S. & de Vogel, V. (2021). “Ja, nu hoor ik je weer…” Werken op afstand met reclasseringscliënten: nieuwe kansen voor de werkalliantie. Utrecht: Programma KFZ.
  16. Henskens, R., Menger, A., Kleijer-Kool L., De Vogel V., Donker A., Jungmann N., Wijsbroek, S., Van Doorn, L. (2019). De werkalliantie als onderwerp van gesprek tussen cliënten en professionals. Utrecht: Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie, Hogeschool Utrecht.
  17. Horvath, A.O., Del Re, A.C., Flückiger, C. & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9–16.
  18. Horvath, A.O. & Greenberg, L.S. (1986). The development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In L. Greenberg & W. Pinsof (Eds.), The therapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 529-556). New York: The Guilford Press.
  19. Hubley, S., Lynch, S.B., Schneck, C., Thomas, M. & Shore, J. (2016). Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes. World Journal of Psychiatry, 6(2), 269.
  20. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Laippala, P. & Salokangas, R.K.R. (1997). Impact of coercion on treatment outcome. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20(3), 311–322.
  21. Kamp, D., Machielsen, G. & Van Os, J. (2020). De toepassing van psychotherapeutische behandeling via beeldbellen. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 3.
  22. Lopez, A., Schwenk, S., Schneck, C.D., Griffin, R.J. & Mishkind, M.C. (2019). Technology-based mental health treatment and the impact on the therapeutic alliance. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(8), 76.
  23. Luxton, D.D., & Lexcen, F.J. (2018). Forensic competency evaluations via videoconferencing: A feasibility review and best practice recommendations. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 49(2), 124–131.
  24. Marchand, A., Beaulieu-Prévost, D., Guay, S., Bouchard, S., Drouin, M.S. & Germain, V. (2011). Relative efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy administered by videoconference for posttraumatic stress disorder: a six-month follow-up. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(3), 304–321.
  25. Montes, L.K. (2010). A Meta-Analysis of Video Based Interventions in Adult Mental Health. Clinical Psychology, 145.
  26. Norwood, C., Moghaddam, N.G., Malins, S. & Sabin‐Farrell, R. (2018). Working alliance and outcome effectiveness in videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review and noninferiority meta‐analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 25(6), 797–808.
  27. Philipszoon, D. (2021). Wat doet online behandelen met de therapeutische relatie en de therapeut? Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie, 3.
  28. Rammstedt, B. & John, O.P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10 item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203‐212.
  29. Sales, C.P., McSweeney, L., Saleem, Y. & Khalifa, N. (2018). The use of telepsychiatry within forensic practice: a literature review on the use of videolink – a ten-year follow-up. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(3), 387–402.
  30. Simpson, S.G. & Reid, C.L. (2014). Therapeutic alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy: a review: alliance in videoconferencing psychotherapy. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 22(6), 280–299.
  31. Simpson, S., Richardson, L., Pietrabissa, G., Castelnuovo, G. & Reid, C. (2021). Videotherapy and therapeutic alliance in the age of COVID‐19. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(2), 409–421.
  32. Slone, N.C., Reese, R.J. & McClellan, M.J. (2012). Telepsychology outcome research with children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Psychological Services, 9(3), 272–292.
  33. Snyder, C.M.J. & Anderson, S.A. (2009). An examination of mandated versus voluntary referral as a determinant of clinical outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(3), 278–292.
  34. Vertommen, H. & Vervaeke, G. A. C. (1990). Werkalliantievragenlijst (WAV). Vertaling voor experimenteel gebruik van de WAI (Horvath & Greenberg, 1986). Leuven: Departement Psychologie K.U. Leuven.