Zelfregulatieoriëntaties en werkprestaties

Preventie-oriëntatie draagt bij aan prestatie van medewerkers en organisatie als geheel
03/04/2015
Dagmar Beudeker, Floor Rink, Naomi Ellemers, Roland Blonk
Geen reacties
De-Psycholoog-nr.-4-April-2015
Issue 4

Samenvatting

SELFREGULATION ORIENTATIONS AND WORK PERFORMANCE
D.A. BEUDEKER, N. ELLEMERS, F.A. RINK & R.W.B. BLONK
What motivates people, and when do they perform optimally at work? In this contribution, we take a regulatory focus perspective (RFT, Higgins, 1997) to provide answers to these important questions. We report the results of multiple studies, conducted in complex organizational environments. In many of those environments, there is a clear preference for promotion oriented employees and leaders. Yet, many jobs contain both promotion and prevention tasks. Our results show that the use of the prevention orientation contributes importantly to both individual and organizational performance.

1269 Weergaven
2 Downloads
  • Samenvatting
  • Zelfregulatie en prestatie
  • Voorkeur voor promotie-oriëntatie
  • Regulatieve taakheterogeniteit
  • Preventie-oriëntatie leidinggevenden
  • Stimuleren werkprestatie op regulatieve taken
  • Besluit
  • Noot
  • Literatuurlijst
  • Over de auteur
Log in
Wat motiveert mensen in hun werk? Hoe kunnen ze optimaal presteren? In deze bijdrage benaderen Dagmar Beudeker cs. deze vragen vanuit het perspectief van de Regulatory Focus Theory (RFT) van Higgins (1997). Onderhavig artikel is gebaseerd op meerdere studies waarin de relatie tussen zelfregulatie-oriëntaties en werkprestaties van mensen in complexe organisaties nader is onderzocht.

Wat motiveert mensen in hun werk, en hoe kunnen ze optimaal presteren? Dit zijn belangrijke vragen waar veel psychologen in de praktijk mee te maken hebben. In deze bijdrage benaderen we deze vragen vanuit het perspectief van de Regulatory Focus Theory (RFT) van Higgins (1997)17. RFT gaat uit van twee systemen die het doelgerichte gedrag van mensen sturen; een preventie-oriëntatie en een promotieoriëntatie. Wanneer iemand een preventie-oriëntatie heeft, is deze persoon gericht op het nakomen van verplichtingen en op het voorkomen van fouten. Wanneer iemand een promotie-oriëntatie heeft, ligt de nadruk juist op het verwezenlijken van idealen en is men op zoek naar kansen om dit succes te bereiken.

De zelfregulatie-oriëntaties die mensen in het werk hanteren kunnen helpen hun werkprestaties te optimaliseren. Deze oriëntaties beïnvloeden namelijk de manier waarop mensen aan hun taken werken en hoe ze proberen om goede resultaten te behalen (Crowe & Higgins, 1997; Friedman & Förster, 2001; Fö

Literatuurlijst

  1. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C.K.W. & Nijstad, B.A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.
  2. Berg, J.M., Dutton, J.E. & Wrzesniewski, A. (2013). Job crafting and meaningful work. In B.J.Dik, Z.S. Byrne & M.F. Steger (Eds.), Purpose and meaning in the workplace (81-104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  3. Beudeker, D.A., Ellemers, N., Rink, F.A. & Blonk, R.W.B. (2014). Testing the effectiveness of interventions to enhance performance on regulatory oriented tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden. Chung-Yan, G.A. (2010). The non-linear eff ects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover and psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 237-251.
  4. Crowe, E. & Higgins, E.T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117–132.
  5. Desombre, T., Kelliher, C., MacFarlane, F. & Ozbilgin, M. (2006). Re-organizing work roles in health care: Evidence from the implementation of functional fl exibility. British Journal of Management, 17, 139-151.
  6. Dorenbosch, L., Van Engen, M. & Verhagen, M. (2005). On-thejob innovation: the impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 129-141.
  7. Ellemers, N. & De Gilder, D. (2012). Je werkt anders dan je denkt. Business Contact.
  8. Faddegon, K., Scheepers, D & Ellemers, N. (2008). ‘If we have the will, there will be a way: regulatory focus as group identity’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 880-895.
  9. Faddegon, K., Ellemers, N. & Scheepers, D. (2009). Eager to be the Best, or Vigilant Not to Be the Worst: The Emergence of Regulatory Focus in Disjunctive and Conjunctive Group Tasks. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 653-671.
  10. Fiske, S.T. (1993). Controlling other people: the impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621-628.
  11. Förster, J., Higgins, E.T. & Bianco A.T. (2003). Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built in trade-off or separate strategic concerns. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90, 148–164.
  12. Förster J. & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMO-sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 175-197.
  13. Freitas, A.L. & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6.
  14. Friedman, R. S. & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.
  15. Galinksy, A.D. & Kilduff , G.J. (2013). Be seen as a leader. Harvard Business Review, 91, 127-130.
  16. Hammond, M.M., Neff , N.L., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A.R. & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 90-105.
  17. Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
  18. Higgins, E.T., Shah, J.Y. & Friedman, R. (1998). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515–525.
  19. Higgins, E.T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fi t. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
  20. Jacobs, D. (1981). Toward a theory of mobility and behavior in organizations: An inquiry into the consequences of some relationships between individual performance and organizational success. The American Journal of Sociology, 87, 684-707.
  21. Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: a systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-52.
  22. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H. & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
  23. Latimer, A. E., Rivers, S. E., Rench, T. A., Katulak, N. A, Hicks, A., et al. (2008). A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fi t messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 826-832.
  24. Lepak, D.P. & Schnell, S.A. (2002). Examing the human resource architecture: The relationship among human capital, employment, and human resource confi gurations. Journal of Management, 28, 517-543.
  25. Liberman, N., Idson, L.C., Camacho, C.J. & Higgins, E.T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
  26. Neubert, M.J., Carlson, D.S., Kacmar, M.K., Chonko, L.B. & Roberts, J.A. (2008). Regulatory focus as a mediator of the infl uence of initiating structure and servant leadership on employee behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1220-1233.
  27. Sassenberg, K. & Hansen, N. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 421-444.
  28. Sassenberg, K., Scheepers, D. & Ellemers, N. (2012). ‘The attraction of social power: The infl uence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 550-555.
  29. Seibt, B. & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes infl uence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38–56.
  30. Shalley, C.E., Gilson, L.L. & Blum, T.C. (2000). Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: eff ects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 215-223.
  31. Updegraff , J.A., Sherman, D.K., Luyster, F.S. & Mann, T. L. (2007). The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 249-257.
  32. Van Dijk, D. & Kluger, A.N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 1084-1105.
  33. Wallace, J.C. & Chen, G. (2006). A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 529–557.
  34. Wallace, J.C., Johnson, P.D. & Frazier, M.L. (2009). An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the Regulatory Focus at Work Scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 805-831.
  35. Wu, C., McMullen, J., Neubert, M. & Yi, X. (2008). The influence of leader regulatory focus on employee creativity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 587-602.
  36. Xie, J.L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1288–1309.